Man’s
Search for Meaning
Author:
Viktor Frankl
Rachel
Borgemenke and Greg Holben
Man’s Search for Meaning is written
by a Jewish Holocaust survivor and psychologist, Viktor E. Frankl, and it gives
a unique psychological perspective into the daily life of not just Viktor, but
other prisoners during their wretched stay at various concentration camps. The
novel begins with Viktor’s rationalization for writing this book. He confers
about how there are three definite phases to a prisoner’s reaction to their
life at a concentration camp that occur throughout their occupation. The first
phase expresses how the prisoners are in complete shock once they arrive at the camps. They still cannot fathom that
they are in this “hellish place”. The next stage elaborates that at a certain
point the prisoners are not apathetic towards
the death and suffering that is around them every day. They are totally
emotionless to the tragedies that are in their vicinity. The last phase
discloses the psychology of a prisoner right after their liberation from the
concentration camps, acceptance of
what has occurred. They struggle with the realization that they can go back to
their old lives and it affects their daily mental processes.
These three stages can be applied
to any event that an individual sees as tragic. These stages can be seen in
events as tragic as being a holocaust victim or, in a not as severe sense,
getting a bad grade that we didn’t expect. When thinking about a test that
we’ve failed, we first go into a state of shock. We couldn’t have done that
terribly! Following this stage of shock is apathy and a state of emotionless
because we do not know what will become of our grade and we don’t know what to
do about it. However, after time has passed your senses come-to and the third
stage has begun, your realization, or acceptance, that life will move on and
you have learned to study harder next time. These tragic events are described
by Viktor as challenges that set individuals up to realize the purpose behind
each event. We go through these stages as a means to seek for our purpose in
life and in his novel he describes his personal journey through the stages.
In the book, Viktor depicts his
personal tragic story and each phase. Phase one began with his arrival at his
first concentration camp, Auschwitz. He explains how he and his fellow
prisoners at this point held onto the small glimmer of hope that they will be
liberated at the last possible moment. He correlates this feeling to a phrase
called “delusion of reprieve”. This
phrase can be explained when thinking of a man on death row acquiring a false
belief that they will be reprieved seconds before their execution was supposed
to commence. Next, Viktor recollects how after getting off the train right
after arriving at Auschwitz, the women and men were shred of all of their
clothes and belongings and divided into two lines, one for the women, and one
for the men. Following the split, each person would advance to a SS guard who
pointed either left or right depending upon the individual’s physique. If the
person looked capable for work they went right, if they looked frail they went
left towards the crematoriums, or “showers”. Following selection between the strong
and weak the prisoners were sent to poorly constructed buildings contaminated
with infectious diseases, including typhus. After each prisoner claimed their
“place” within their new home their minds began whirling with ugly thoughts.
Within these buildings men would lose themselves and eventually Viktor
described their mental processes as that of animals. With their mental state declining prisoners began to think
of better ways to die than starving or becoming infected in a concentration
camp. Viktor conveys to the reader how every singly prisoner contemplated suicide
at some point due to the hopelessness they felt on a daily basis.
Transitioning into the second phase
of reaction, in which Viktor terms the apathetic stage, we begin by being told
of how the prisoners become numb to the horrors that surrounded them. A
prisoner would watch a gruesome beating by a Capo or a SS guard on a fellow
prisoner and not have the slightest emotional reaction to the incident. It was
always known that the Capos were power
hungry and most aggressive toward the prisoners, yet, those who suffered in
their apathetic state were unable to acknowledge the mistreatment. Viktor recalls
a time that he worked in a small hospital located within the fences of
Auschwitz that he would see patients pass from Typhus and not have the least
bit of remorse for those patients. During this phase Viktor, however,
befriended a prominent Capo within the concentration camp. Viktor would provide
excellent psychological advice to the Capo. Following the author’s release from
camp he stated that this relationship may have saved his life because the Capo
assigned Viktor to easier jobs and provided him with other important things for
survival. After that, he discloses to the reader how the food and water rations
had been gradually decreasing as his internment grew longer. As a result,
Viktor could see who was going to die next.
Following his time in Auschwitz, Viktor
was shipped to a “rest camp” outside Dachau. Viktor felt extremely uneasy once
he heard the news of his transfer, but became relieved upon his arrival that
there was no “chimney” which put him at ease because he knew that he could not be
gassed there. Once at the new concentration camp, Viktor comes to the
realization that the prisoners do not have any complex thoughts anymore, just
thoughts about survival. They have become numb. This sickens him deeply, but he
understands why this happened. In addition, Viktor observed that a prisoner’s number
was more important than their name. This demonstrated the type of disregard for
life at the concentration camp. During his time at the “rest camp”, he as well
as the other prisoners have the feeling that they will never be liberated from
this “hellish place”. For that reason, he concludes that the prisoner’s morale
is increasingly more suicidal, so he voices to the prisoners that they need to
use psychotherapeutic techniques, such as thinking about the bright future
these prisoners will have after liberation, to stay alive. This technique is
known as logotherapy which is continuous theme throughout the book. The author
describes this therapy as the will to
find the meaning to life.
The purpose of Man’s Search for
Meaning was not intended to show people how to find a purpose in their
life, but more-so to tell about a man that overcame so much by taking life’s
hardships not as negatives, but taking them on as challenges. Viktor wrote the
novel in 9 days and was able to
convey that by evaluating yourself in terms of the things you have accomplished
and allow your reaction to shape who you become. By being aware of who you are,
what you’ve done, and what you can do you can get that much closer to finding
your own life’s purpose. Viktor considers there to be 3 sources of meaning that
help us stay positive and face what he calls “Tragic Optimism”. He says that by
doing something significant, work,
caring for other, love, and having courage during difficult times we can
conquer anything and each of these aspects can help us find our purpose.
During difficult times there are
three parts to Tragic Optimism: pain, guilt, death. These aspects are different
groups of what we must overcome to successful complete a life obstacle. In
order to be successful, though, you must remain optimistic by reminding
yourself why you are here. For instance, in the novel Viktor claims that man’s
highest goal is to find love. Therefore, to help remain positive seek out the
three sources of meaning and find what keeps you motivated. Despite the shape
they were in upon liberation of the camps, Viktor and his fellow camp mates all
had something keeping them alive besides food and water. They found their
purpose.
In the shift to the third reaction
phase, the psychology of a prisoner after his liberation, or acceptance of what
has occurred. To further explain, it is the mindset following the end of
whatever tragic event or challenge has occurred. In the book, the prisoners’
mindset begins with complete shock that they have been liberated. Then, he
becomes disillusioned and bitter once they returned to their former life. This
bitterness stems from their fellow townsmen who claim “[they] did not know about
[the camps].” Prisoners were disillusioned because when they got back they
usually had nothing that they had in the past, including their family members. The
author himself had lost both a manuscript and his pregnant wife during his time
at the concentration camp, the two very things that motivated his will to live. Each of us have our own
will to live that stems from whatever we feel is most important to us. For some
it may be a goal, others it may be their family. In that sense, our will to
live is individual and can only be determined by oneself.
Viktor concludes his book by saying,
“The crowning experience of all, for the homecoming man, is the wonderful
feeling that, after all he has suffered, there is nothing he need fear any
more—except his god.” He essentially states that these prisoners have seen the
worst that mankind produce so they need not to worry about anything except God
now. In our own lives we can evaluate the experiences we have gone through and
how we have overcome them. Those experience are what we learn from and help us
grow and shape the person we are; however, it is not our life events or
tragedies that shape who we are, but our reactions to them. We have control
over who we become and the purpose of our lives.
“Interviews”
Juan
(20), Loretta (22), Martina (21), Antonio (21)
-
Do you
feel that you know what the meaning of your life is?
o Juan-
Yes, it is simple. He believe it is the pursuit of happiness.
o Loretta-
thinks that her purpose is to live each moment to its fullest
o Martina-
I do not. Feels that she’s too young and her “five-year” plans always seem to
fall through, so she doesn’t feel that she has made to a point that she can
determine her life’s meaning.
o Antonio-
No, because the meaning of life can be so different from person to person.
-
How did
you figure out the meaning or, if you have not, how will you?
o Juan-
through his experiences of the catholic church and with the priest
o Loretta-
She has done, in her life, what she feels makes her happy because she feels
that life is about being happy
o Martina-
Hopes to figure it out through family and career (teaching) and looks forward
to have children later in life. She feels that these will give her a “purpose”
in the world.
o Antonio-
He will keep doing things that will make him happy, prideful, and will help him
find his meaning of life.
-
Can you
think of an example in your own life when an experience shaped who you are?
o Juan- one
day he was fishing and fell off the dock, someone jumped in to save him. While
underwater he saw all of his loved ones flash through his mind and he found
this event humbling. It shared with him those who truly mattered to him
o Loretta-
there was a time in her life that she felt that nothing seemed to be going
right until one moment she felt that everything was going to be ok and she just
needed to be happy.
o Martina-
when house burnt down in 2010. Learned to appreciate more things because you
expect things to be there all the time, you get in a routine, and then when
it’s gone it opens your eyes to what could actually happen. Nothing is
guaranteed.
o Antonio-
Traveling through Europe with his father as a little boy broadened his horizons
and made his more accepting of others
-
Do you
think that the majority of people know what the meaning of life is?
o Juan-
yes, because at a certain point through life and after certain experiences he
believes that everyone will find it.
o Loretta-
Believes that everyone has their own view of what the meaning of life is
o Martina-
honestly no. People are not focused enough to think and search for their life’s
true meaning. Plus, they do not take the time or don’t have the time to do so.
o Antonio-
No, because it is complex and difficult to understand and fully comprehend
12
Questions
What is
logotherapy?
What are
the 3 phases of Mental Reactions?
Who were
more aggressive towards prisoners?
What does
Viktor consider to be the 3 sources of meaning?
3 Things
make up “Tragic Optimism”, what are they?
In terms
of the prisoner’s mental processes, who does the author (Viktor) compare them
to?
Man’s
highest goal that they can aspire to is ______.
Which was
the 1st concentration camp he went to?
“Forces
beyond your control can take your freedom to choose how you will respond to the
situation” p. X. Summarize what this quote means?
What 2
things motivated Viktor’s will to live while he was in the concentration camp?
How
long did it take Frank to write Man’s Search for Meaning?
1. I’m sure the author was distraught and broken when he arrived to the rest camp. What motivated him to persuade others to think about a brighter future?
ReplyDelete2. The summary states that the man’s highest goal is to find love. I feel like man’s highest goal should be to remain optimistic throughout life. If one is not optimistic and can’t find the good within the bad, how will he/she ever be able to fully love someone?
3. The author states that the prisoners have seen the worst possible and should only fear God. The prisoners have so much to be thankful to God for. Why would they FEAR God rather than be grateful of him?
4. How can I react to my tragedies to become a better person in life and to find my purpose?
1. If I was in this situation what would be my means to live?
ReplyDelete2. How does he say someone can accept and become numb to all the means of torture?
3. What experiences will make us stronger and which will make us weaker depending on our attitude?
4. Are there just three stages or are there in-betweens to transition between them?
Sarah Wilson:
ReplyDeleteHow can I stay positive and overcome things when so many bad things seem to happen at once?
What are some things I can do in my life to help myself find my purpose?
If someone isn't a spiritual person, can they still be able to learn from this book since God is a major part of it?
Can those three stages of tragedy really be applied to every type of tragedy that can possibly occur in people's lives?
1. How can I get to the point of finding the purpose of life?
ReplyDelete2. How can I stay optimistic when there appears to be no hope?
3. How did the survivors find acceptance when they went through hell and came out to people who didn’t do anything about it?
4. It’s hard to compare little conflicts we may go through to something as tragic as the Holocaust. Even the example of getting a bad grade seems not relatable. Can I still believe this theory works in a lesser degree?
1.) What happens if ones "negative" thoughts overcome any sense of optimism?
ReplyDelete2.) Does that tragedy that an individual experiences have to be an extreme such as this one in order to eventually find the meaning of life?
3.) With the meaning of life, does one ever find it or is it this limitless factor that one will spend forever searching for?
4.) Is Viktor basically saying that we hold the power to discover what the meaning of life within us since it is a self motivated action? Or why not?
1.Do all prisoners face all three of these phases, or do some people skip certain phases, or possibly never reach the final phase?
ReplyDelete2. How can a person be convinced to continue to find the meaning to life to get through their imprisonment when they are ready to give up?
3. Is there a set time frame that it usually takes a liberated prisoner to feel that they can get back to their normal lives?
4. After their liberation, how can they be certain they have nothing left to fear but their God, when in reality, the same situation could possibly happen again?
1. How does one go about searching for the meaning of life?
ReplyDelete2. Isn't the meaning of life different for everyone else?
3. Are the three stages of tragic optimism applicable to events that are not as severe as the Holocaust.
4. Why should we search for the meaning of life?
1. Are there other psychotherapeutic techniques that could help me discover my purpose in life that comes from a less extreme experience?
ReplyDelete2. Are there any other tools that I can use to make my life more meaningful?
3. Do you think that in some circumstances people did not reach the extreme level of apathy that the author felt that they did?
4. What can I do to make myself think about other peoples struggles before my own?
1. Did the author use any imaginary future scenarios to get him through the camp?
ReplyDelete2. Was the author in the same camp as any of his family members?
3. Do you really think that everyone who goes through a traumatic experiences these same three steps?
4. How does someone have the will to find the meaning of life if they are truly miserable?
1. Will I ever learn the purpose of my life?
ReplyDelete2. Will the three stages lead me to find my purpose in life?
3. What if individuals don't go through serious tragic events to go through the stages fully but on a smaller scale? Will it be harder to find their purpose of life?
4. Do you think the author truly found the purpose of his life?
Kelsey Joy
ReplyDelete1. Could one fall so far deep in one of the first phases of tragedy and never be able to get out?
2. How does one ever know what their meaning of life is?
3. What are successful techniques I can remain optimistic when I am experiencing some sort of tragedy?
4. Throughout this novel it is only told through the authors eyes, how can I be sure the ways he states help people through tragedy really work? How can he know that just because it worked for him, it'll work for everyone else, including myself?
LeChae Nelson
ReplyDelete1. When searching for the meaning of life, is there a certain amount of time it should take?
2. Is it possible to look at the optimism is literally every single tragedy?
3. What if going through a depressive stage in ones life is how they get through things? Is it wrong to still go through it?
4. It is necessary for everyone to find their meaning of life?